strela

Kateryna Dizzy Streltsova Dizzy Streltsova itibaren Sremski оkrug itibaren Sremski оkrug

Okuyucu Kateryna Dizzy Streltsova Dizzy Streltsova itibaren Sremski оkrug

Kateryna Dizzy Streltsova Dizzy Streltsova itibaren Sremski оkrug

strela

This book is a must for anyone who eats food. Ever wondered how your food makes its way onto your plate? Ever wondered how good and simple growing food and raising livestock could be? Ever wondered which is better, local or organic? Read this book! Learn how to forage for wild mushrooms. Learn how to kill a chicken and then eat it for dinner. Learn how to sustainably farm. It's all in here. You will examine your eating habits over and over again when you read this book!

strela

Disturbed by the low voter turnout in 1920 and energized by the enfranchisement of women, civic organization undertook a massive Get Out The Vote movement in the 1920s--using innovative campaigns with modern advertising, radio, cars, newsreels and other media....and it failed (well, depending on your motivations....) The campaign, as studied by Gidlow, was in the hands of upper middle class white elites in their communities, and the resulting message was in English, privileged "experienced citizenship", linked citizenship to American historical events only WASPS would have been in, put voter registration tables in department stores and campaigned for "decent" politicians and "independent thinking" to break corruption and machine politics. While the League of Women Voters genuinely saw itself as non-partisan, the National Association of Manufacturers positioned these same calls against LaFollett and ethnic voters. When GOTV materials appeared in union newsletters or ethnic neighborhood, the message was still one that failed to resonate with or caused resentment by potential voters who interpreted them as being told that it wasn't their vote being mobilized, and it resounded cruelly in the Jim Crow south, as none of the campaigns address poll taxes or voting discrimination. This is a fascinating study of something that looked straightforward and beneficial, but on closer examination, is a lot more politically complicated and meaningful.